Welcome to SimRacing.Club
We are an online racing league, and has years of experience using S397´s rFactor 2. We have several series - VEC which is the official rFactor 2 endurance championship. 6-24 hour races - its all about endurance.
VEC´s feeder series Virtual Le Mans Series and several special events - Plenty of racing. Register today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll just need to introduce yourself and then you can start off in our Academy series
yeah nice battel ...i was on lap 13 think and that is to old tires for baattel but it was nice,you let me about 4 sec behind and when i started to katsch you again ..les than 2 sec i must to pit in...Nice little battle for fifth place with Team Vires #99 (action for revenge part will start from 2:30
Had better tires but also more fuel load and little damage. And as always; Karma is a bitch!
I have been working elsewhere this weekend (night shifts) so yes they will be posted once they are done, expect between 7-14 days since we have 4 divisions we need to review. That is 32 hours of racingWhen can we expect the stewards to finish voting? 14 days have past since the race now.
No we don’t agree on that 0.3 is still 0.3 more than 0.0. Slowing down is somewhat hard with cars around you. Speeding up is VERY easy to not do too soon. You can’t argue a way out of the car took off too soon.@Jimmi Allison
Surely the tolerance isnt equal to the c80 engagement vs the c80 release, when i was 80kph at the engagement some cars (138kph, 89kph, 99kph,104kph,95kph,88kph,126kph thats only lmp2s. surely some might have had engagment violations, what is the timestamp for that please. on my defense i might jumped the gun on the "F" of "green flag but thats not even a second :/
yep around a third of a second i get a DT ;/ im sorry but .300s is too strict as a tolerance im sure we can agree on that.
View attachment 6025
View attachment 6027
Again wording means nothing in the IRR - when doing 50-60-70 it’s hard to explain it again and again. As I’ve said before we can easily just post a penalty list instead.
Report it yes, that would be the only really option as rules does say:out of curiosity were the starts reviewed? happen to notice one when I checked mine but as it was not a direct impact to me I did not put an irr in. In future if we notice a jump should we report it? thanks.
okay, cool, thank you for the info, will remember to put one in in future if I happen to stumble across somethingReport it yes, that would be the only really option as rules does say:
17.5 Drivers are encouraged to submit an Incident Review Request. Stewards will not review the complete race.
It is very hard to make sure all incidents are reviewed if not submitted since this round is 32 hours of racemode +4x45 mins of qualifying.
I will have to review the archives of the race start, i honestly cant remember since my reviews was done the week after the race, with a few exceptions.
I do not know why, but every time I read these IRRs I smile, for a much lighter contact than this in NOLA, car 1 had a SnH 60 seconds ..... here only a warning18837 - Exiting T11, J Stesnaes makes a mistake, allowing D Cannistraci to pass on the inside before T12. He tries to pass on the outside but is not close nough and makes contact as Cannistraci rebounds off the curb
Warning - J Stensnaes - Avoidable Contact